<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Busted: Niles Goldstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bustedhalo.com/features/busted-niles-goldstein/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bustedhalo.com/features/busted-niles-goldstein</link>
	<description>an online magazine for spiritual seekers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi Niles Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://bustedhalo.com/features/busted-niles-goldstein/comment-page-1#comment-5858</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi Niles Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=10009#comment-5858</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d have to ask the Romans....

More seriously, Jesus teaches a lot of different things in the Gospels, many of them contradictory. In some versions, he preaches that he is literally God incarnate--and in that time and place that would have been considered idolatry, a capital offense. I like your take on what Jesus taught, but my reading of the New Testament suggests that, at a minimum, he saw himself as an intermediary, or intercessor, BETWEEN us and God (hence the model for and precursor to the notion of a priest in Catholicism). Even if your take is right and that IS what he taught, it would have bordered on pantheism, which certainly would have gotten him into trouble anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d have to ask the Romans&#8230;.</p>
<p>More seriously, Jesus teaches a lot of different things in the Gospels, many of them contradictory. In some versions, he preaches that he is literally God incarnate&#8211;and in that time and place that would have been considered idolatry, a capital offense. I like your take on what Jesus taught, but my reading of the New Testament suggests that, at a minimum, he saw himself as an intermediary, or intercessor, BETWEEN us and God (hence the model for and precursor to the notion of a priest in Catholicism). Even if your take is right and that IS what he taught, it would have bordered on pantheism, which certainly would have gotten him into trouble anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pickens</title>
		<link>http://bustedhalo.com/features/busted-niles-goldstein/comment-page-1#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pickens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/?p=10009#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>Since Yeshua ben Yosef was born a Jew and died a Jew, what did he teach that got him killed. Not to poison the well, but I think he taught that there was no division between G-d and humans.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Yeshua ben Yosef was born a Jew and died a Jew, what did he teach that got him killed. Not to poison the well, but I think he taught that there was no division between G-d and humans.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

