Busted Halo
googling god
The Busted Halo Question Box
Ask our spiritual experts virtually anything!
This is the place where you can ask all of those burning questions that you wouldn't dare ask in person. We will post questions here (using your byline only with permission); we guarantee an answer to everyone.

Have your own question? Then pitch it to us!

Caitlin Kennell Kim
Fr. Rick Malloy, SJ
General Questions
Fr. Tom Ryan, CSP
Ecumenical, Interfaith
Neela Kale
Culture, Moral Theology
Ann Naffziger, M.A., M.Div.
Mike Hayes
Our readers asked:

Did Jesus Have a Tattoo on His Thigh in Revelation 19:16?

Ann Naffziger Answers:

The verse in question here is the only verse in the New Testament that appears to suggest that Jesus had something “inscribed” on his body. However, such a suggestion is in direct contradiction of a law in Leviticus 19:28 “You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you.” Not only would the idea of a Jewish man having a tattoo be shocking, even more so is the suggestion that his thigh would be exposed, something basically equated with public nudity in Jesus’ time and religious culture.

A theory that easily explains such a contradiction is that the book of Revelation was originally written in Hebrew, not Greek as previously assumed. If that is the case, a miniscule copying error by an early scribe would easily render the Hebrew word for “banner” as “thigh” instead. The first Hebrew letter for the word “banner”, dagel, looks almost exactly like the first Hebrew letter for “thigh”, ragel. So it is posited that the correct reading of Rev 19:16 is “On his robe and on his banner he has a name inscribed, ‘King of Kings and Lord of lords.’”

The Author : Ann Naffziger
Ann Naffziger is a scripture instructor and spiritual director in the San Francisco Bay area. She has has written articles on spirituality and theology for various national magazines and edited several books on the Hebrew Scriptures.
See more articles by (125).
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.
  • Corner Pew

    How sad that a person that writes spiritual and theology for national magazines would write such mess. I have notice that most of the people that haven’t got a tat on them, are the ones that preach that Lev.19:28 is for us today, but, if you had a tat.would you still do that…I’m going to tell you what is wrong with what your doing..and you Ann should know better..You can’t take one passage for the Bible and make a whole truth around it. If 28 is for us today, then the whole thing is for us..it makes no sense to take out one passage, and say the rest does not count..That’s like taking one word out of a scripture teach it as truth…Like, Money is the root of all evil..so we should all not use money..because it’s evil..but, it really says..The love of money is the root of all evil…and that is what you and a lot of Christians are doing..They are taking the word “Dead” for the dead..out..and saying that we are not to cut or mark ourselves…Besides that..All people like you are doing is giving people that are not saved a weapon to use against our wittiness, I could be telling someone about Jesus, and they could look down and see a tattoo that I got before I gave my life to Jesus, and what do you think they would say..:Oh, Mister, Christian, you’ve got a tat!, God said not to do that..you are a sinner, I’m not going to listen to you!” Then they will walk away…That is what your teaching is doing, it’s killing a persons wittiness about Jesus..Think about that Ann, before you build a truth around one passage…

    • Mel Clark

      Your correct, the bible says add nothing to nor take anything from

  • Eric

    Why does it matter?
    Jesus is an Egyptian allegorical myth for the Sun appropriated by Egyptian slaves (property) under a state mandate of monotheism.
    Amen (Ra)

    • Corner Pew

      This woman is taking a passage from the Bible and making a whole truth around..If you have a tat..go in peace my brother..you’re fine with Jesus

  • renna

    It was probably a wound or a bruise.

  • Jones Chad

    And who’s to say that its not a human error to possibly correct what was originally transcribed? Perhaps Jesus shall appear to us again with all the names of his enemies upon his thigh. We dont know. And all of this is STILL speculation. And for anyone to assume that for me to have tattoos means im going to hell is an attrocious a front to God, Jesus and everything they claim to believe in. Who are any of us to pass judgements?

    • Corner Pew

      Don’t worry..it’s not true what this woman wrote..Be at peace with your tats..go get more..Just don’t do it for the dead..and don’t use a rock..

  • Alex

    This is so funny! So people think that what was given to People as a Law is the same applicable law to others? If we put symbols on the Temple of God. and Jesus body is the Temple then? Tattoos will be applicable. Maybe when we see him we will know exactly who he is by the Tattoos. It says like a thief so He might as well

  • Amyrican Grant

    He came as flesh, therefore, imperfect by made by man. Yet, he strived for the light, and was granted God’s Grace, who also is imperfect, but whom was surrendered woman to change, guidance, and pure love for universe. Amy

  • Ike Ezeoke

    In leviticus it says “You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you.” I’m sorry but is jesus dead?

    • Jim Winstrand

      …. to Christians,,, Jesus is very much alive. It also says not to wear clothing from two different fabrics or eat fruit that is not aged…. hope you’re doing all of that too.

  • Jesse Jamesink

    Ok 1st off Lev is VERY loosely translated here..thats not in entirety what it says. It say “do not _Mark_ your body in ritual as the pagan does”. So unless you running around neckid chanting rants ro the god rah as you recieve your ritual marking, your not doing that.
    2nd…the word Tattoo, polynesian in origan, did not exsist in The days of Lev. An probablly not in the days of Jesus. Its a fairly new word.
    3rd ibviously Jesus has “King of Kings Lord of Lords” written upon his thigh. It says so. Tattoo..as much of a stretch as most people make with Lev.

  • kaykayy johnson

    you are wrong about Leviticus 19:28 – it relates specifically to the pagan ritual of worshipping the dead where they would tattoo marks and cut their flesh as part of the ritual. Also if you read the verse out of conduct you misunderstand that Jesus was setting rules for the Isralites at that time, not a rule for all Christians and if you think it is for all then you must follow the whole passage examples – :
    vs 19 …you shall not wear cloth of two kinds of materials
    vs 26 you shall not eat any flesh with blood in it
    vs 27 you must not cut the hair on your forehead or clip the ends of your beard

    • William Sperry

      That’s a pretty strong statement. What is it that established Jesus Christ as the Holy unspotted Lamb of God? Since He is the one who’s obedience to the will of God, ” even to death on the cross” brought about God’s gracious plan of salvation, Jesus had to be perfect in the law. What does Jesus mean in Mt 5:17-18 “Do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. (18) For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away , one jot or tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.”? I agree that you and I are ” under the law of grace” as believers, but Jesus is the fulfillment of All of God’s law. I agree with the ordinal post that there is a greater possibility that what Rev 19:16 indicates is either a banner or sword, or sword in a scabbard. I believethe only marks we will see on His body will the the marks on His hands, feet and side that we in our sinfull

      • William Sperry

        …to continue….state nailed His hands and feet to the cross and pierced His side.

      • kaykayy johnson

        I was just talking about the fact that Jesus having a tattoo would be a contradiction to Leviticus 19:28 which i don’t think it is. when people read it out of context* they misunderstand, that is my interpretation of it, I take it literally. It’s a strong statement but I don’t think God intended those rules to be followed by everyone, just the Israelites at that time, there are other times in the old testament where God has set rules for his people in a particular place and told them what to do, it’s a story in a way, like in Deuteronomy there’s parts where God is setting rules for his chosen people and war time rules, he is not saying that’s how everyone in the world should act all the time. what we read in the bible at times is stating what happened in the past not telling us how to be now. Also I don’t think Jesus will have an ink tattoo like we get in tattoo parlours but I do think that it will be written on his thigh but in like gold italics not ink. And not a tattoo per se but somehow written on his thigh

      • William Sperry

        I think you might be missing the point. Jesus was Jewish, and the only way he could be God’s Holy Lamb, is that He fulfilled, to the letter, all of the Old Testament Law. Including Lev 19:28. Another issue we have is in translating from Hebrew to English, one small punctuation left out of the Hebrew changes the word “thigh” to “banner”. Another point is that if you back up to vvs 11-15 you will see a great deal of symbolism in the description of Christ Jesus,”His eyes were like a flame of fire”, “on His head were many crowns”, His robe “dipped in blood” and “out of His mouth goes a sharp sword”. All of those are symbolic and not literal.

      • Jesse Jamesink

        I disagree… thats not what it says. Paul is very clear in his description. Again stuck at Lev.

      • Jesse Jamesink

        Lev is beein under translated..where is the rest of the verse where it says noy to mark yourself in ritual as the pagan .. and you are right, untill the nations/gentile accepted Christ, they were not under the law. And ince tbey acceptwd Christ they were under the 10 commandments not Jewish law.

      • Emmanuel Ayoola

        but didn’t Jesus work on the Sabbath, Thus “breaking” the law?

      • noreil

        Jesus came to show us how to keep the sabbath ,man had their own way of thinking reading the bible out of context so he came to give us the path to righteousness,so no matter what we think he said you can heal,feed,and still worship on the Sabbath,thats how we keep it holy .

      • stephen harris

        Remember Jesus was and is still given authority overall so He ddnt break the law plus His reply about saving your caw is as true as can be. He just showed us there that people lost the what is and went about their mind set in the law they worshiped to day no God and the things concerning that day. But in reality God was to be worshiped and given praise. Since when doing right thing became wrong ? Only when Man does what he feels is right to benefit Man. Yes they under the Law but they were under God’s guide to do right and He wouldn’t hold it against them when they dd right. When u start doing your own will God steps aside but never leaves u.

      • Jesse Jamesink

        Very well said

    • Jesse Jamesink

      Or..dont get your Tattoo while morning the dead or in “pagan ritual”

    • Mike

      Jesus abolised the laws of Moses anyways

      • Thalinna Sam Barker

        Actually no he didn’t. He upheld divorce that Moses granted only by way of a spouse cheating on another yet if you can reconcile the Lord prefers that and will bless the reconciliation. He came to fulfill the law is exactly what he stated and just because its old testament does not mean its no longer valid. We no longer need sacrifices for he was the ultimate sacrifice. We also no longer stoned for adultery and many other things, for if you do not not repent and trust in Christ your fate is sealed. Hence the Ten Commandments still hold.

  • Ronnie Maynor

    Jesus came and did away with the Law if we are going to live by the Law then you have to live by all of the law not just part of it so you would have to not eat unclean meat and all of our clothes have mix fabric kinda throws a kink in your logic

    • Jesse Jamesink

      Thats exactly why you can to this day see Jews observing every law.

  • Nick Russo

    That reading certainly makes more sense. But what about Rev 19:12, “He has a name written on Him”? Perhaps the prohibition in Leviticus doesn’t apply here because the writing was not applied by a human, but by God. Could it be that labeling ourselves is considered presumptuous? Similarly, it’s not blasphemy when Jesus calls himself the Son of Man.

    • Jesse Jamesink

      Or it wasnt done in ritual as the pagan do

powered by the Paulists