<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is Our Lady of Guadalupe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe</link>
	<description>an online magazine for spiritual seekers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/comment-page-1#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/beta2008/wp/?p=565#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Also, Henry, the tilma itself is 500 years old, yet has not decayed.  Tilma&#039;s are cloaks made from cacti, I believe.  If it were of earthly hands, should have disintegrated half a millennium ago....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Henry, the tilma itself is 500 years old, yet has not decayed.  Tilma&#8217;s are cloaks made from cacti, I believe.  If it were of earthly hands, should have disintegrated half a millennium ago&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://bustedhalo.com/questionbox/who-is-our-lady-of-guadalupe/comment-page-1#comment-5054</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bustedhalo.com/beta2008/wp/?p=565#comment-5054</guid>
		<description>I just want to clarify that scientific analysis has demonstrated that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is NOT a painting if you are defining a painting as: &quot;The representing of a subject on a surface by the application of paint or colors&quot;.  I say that because microscopic examination revealed that there were no brush strokes on the image.  In fact, many including me, believe it to be a miraculous image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to clarify that scientific analysis has demonstrated that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is NOT a painting if you are defining a painting as: &#8220;The representing of a subject on a surface by the application of paint or colors&#8221;.  I say that because microscopic examination revealed that there were no brush strokes on the image.  In fact, many including me, believe it to be a miraculous image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

