Busted Halo
googling god
The Busted Halo Question Box
Ask our spiritual experts virtually anything!
This is the place where you can ask all of those burning questions that you wouldn't dare ask in person. We will post questions here (using your byline only with permission); we guarantee an answer to everyone.

Have your own question? Then pitch it to us!

Caitlin Kennell Kim
Fr. Rick Malloy, SJ
General Questions
Fr. Tom Ryan, CSP
Ecumenical, Interfaith
Neela Kale
Culture, Moral Theology
Ann Naffziger, M.A., M.Div.
Mike Hayes
Our readers asked:

What does it mean to say that the pope is infallible?

Fr. Joe Answers:

The idea of the infallibility of the pope was defined at the first Vatican Council in 1869. The Council was trying to describe the teaching authority of the pope at a time when the pope’s temporal power over the papal states gave way to Italy’s desire for unification. Rome was the last preserve of the pope’s temporal power and this city fell into the hands of the Italian army even as the Vatican Council met.

For many years thereafter the pope was considered a “prisoner of the Vatican,” refusing to set foot in any other part of Italy in protest of the occupation of Rome. Yet during these same years the pope’s spiritual and moral authority grew. The definition of papal infallibility undoubtedly contributed to this growth in spiritual prestige. Due to the embattled situation of the church in its primal diocese, the bishops of the first Vatican Council dispersed without ever formally bringing the Council to a close, or developing an understanding of the relationship of papal authority to that of the bishops and entire people of God.

Sometimes exaggerated claims have been made with respect to papal infallibility, stating that the pope must be considered free from error in any statement he makes. Cardinal Gibbons of Baltimore, who had been the youngest bishop attending the first Vatican Council, once responded to the question “Is the pope infallible in all things?” by declaring, “In my last visit with him he called me Jibbons.”

The actual definition is quite limited. It declares that when the pope teaches with all authority as the leader of the church, he is prevented from proclaiming an error in the areas of faith and morals. When the pope speaks in any less authoritative way, his statements are not considered infallible. Since the declaration took place in 1870, only one papal pronouncement seems to have met this criterion: the teaching of Pope Pius XII about the Assumption of Mary.

Infallibility is not a personal power but rather belongs to the office of pope as leader of the whole church. It is not absolute but is conditioned by scripture (the pope may not teach anything contrary to the Word of God) and by the need to consult the faith of the entire church. In the case of the Assumption, Pius XII polled the bishops throughout the world to verify that this was indeed a universal belief of the church.

Papal infallibility has become an obstacle Catholics encounter in their dialogue with other Christian Churches. John Paul II admitted the dilemma posed by the present understanding of papal primacy and infallibility in his encyclical “Ut Unum Sint,” and has invited Protestant as well as Catholic leaders to join in a reinterpretation of these teachings that will serve to foster unity rather than hinder it. Within the church, authority must always been seen in the context of a power to serve rather than control and to serve especially a unity in faith and love among Christians.

The Author : Fr. Joe
Fr. Joe Scott, CSP, has been a campus minister, pastor and editor as a Paulist priest.
See more articles by (74).
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.
  • G. Miguel

    The doctrine of papal infallibility precipitated a crisis in the Roman Catholic Church at that time. The Old Catholic Church separated from Rome. Also present as an observer at Vatican I in 1870 was Lord Acton of England, a lifelong devout Catholic layman. It was in response to the doctrine of papal infallibility that Acton issued the following famous pronouncement: “I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption, it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”
    – Lord Acton in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton (1887)

powered by the Paulists