Busted Halo
googling god
The Busted Halo Question Box
Ask our spiritual experts virtually anything!
This is the place where you can ask all of those burning questions that you wouldn't dare ask in person. We will post questions here (using your byline only with permission); we guarantee an answer to everyone.

Have your own question? Then pitch it to us!

Caitlin Kennell Kim
Mary
Fr. Rick Malloy, SJ
General Questions
Fr. Tom Ryan, CSP
Ecumenical, Interfaith
Neela Kale
Culture, Moral Theology
Ann Naffziger, M.A., M.Div.
Bible
Mike Hayes
Swingman/Editor
 
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailfacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Our readers asked:

What does the Church teach about homosexuality?

Neela Kale Answers:

The Catholic Church’s teaching on all aspects of human sexuality is derived from our belief that God created human beings, male and female, out of love, and gave us a special vocation to love and to communion. As summarized in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, “the union of man and woman in marriage is a way of imitating in the flesh the Creator’s generosity and fecundity” (CCC, 2335). Thus much of our teaching on sexuality flows from reflection on that special union of man and woman. We believe that certain sexual expressions are reserved to that sacramental union. We also teach that sexual intimacy between a husband and wife has twin purposes: their union, as a couple, and procreation, expressed as openness to the gift of life. But all people – whether married or single, male or female, young or old – are called to chastity. This means “the successful integration of sexuality within the person and thus the inner unity of man in his bodily and spiritual being” (CCC 2337). Chastity is a virtue that is lived in body and spirit. We are all called to love and to love deeply, as God loves us. We do that according to our state of life: married people express that love in a particular commitment to a spouse; priests and vowed religious dedicate themselves in love to God and to serving the Church; single people are called to show love of neighbor in their relationships with friends and family.

This context allows us to consider Church teaching on homosexuality. The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines homosexuality as “relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex” (CCC 2357). Notice that this definition refers to specific acts – “relations” – without addressing the question of sexual orientation. This is in keeping with scriptural references to homosexual acts, which is how homosexuality has been understood throughout much of human history. Modern psychological understanding of sexuality as a matter of orientation is a relatively recent development. Thus the United States Catholic Bishops, in their 1997 pastoral letter “Always Our Children: A Pastoral Message to Parents of Homosexual Children and Suggestions for Pastoral Ministers,” take a broader understanding of homosexuality. They write that “it seems appropriate to recognize sexual orientation (heterosexual or homosexual) as a deep-seated dimension of one’s personality and to recognize its relatively stability in a person.” Both the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the US Catholic Bishops recognize that sexual orientation is not a choice and is not sinful: “Generally, homosexual orientation is experienced as a given, not as something freely chosen. By itself, therefore, a homosexual orientation cannot be considered sinful, for morality presumes the freedom to choose” (“Always our Children”). Thus homosexuality itself is not sinful. It is another part of the great mystery of humankind, all created in the image of God. But sexual relations between men or between women, because they cannot fulfill the twin purposes of sexual intimacy – union and procreation – are “contrary to the natural law” and cannot be approved (CCC 2357).

 
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailfacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
The Author : Neela Kale
Neela Kale is a writer and catechetical minister based in the Archdiocese of Portland. She served with the Incarnate Word Missionaries in Mexico and earned a Master of Divinity at the Jesuit School of Theology. Some of her best theological reflection happens on two wheels as she rides her bike around the hills of western Oregon.
See more articles by (167).
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.
  • mike

    @Andrew: technically yes. @ Bill Same sex relations would be defined as a disordered act according to the church. I would think that it would be difficult for two people to be in a romantic relationship and not have relations–not impossible, but difficult. Let’s remember that intention is also the key. Do you intend to treat this as a “boyfriend or girlfriend” relationship? That would be the key question.

  • Dr. Gene Bourquin

    I say respectfully that this is why I am now an Episcopalian, who still loves and cherish the Roman Church for so many reasons. A thoughtful review of scripture can reveal that it says very little about homosexuality, when it does it has been misinterpreted, and that the bible virtually never addressed mutually, loving, and consenting adult same sex relationships except in a positive way. As it has done and is doing on race and gender, the Church’s discernment on many topics finds a shifting perspective.

  • Deblette

    All sexual relations outside of marriage are the same level of sinfulness. It is grave sin. Hell time. :)

  • andrew

    so does this mean that homosexual sex, and heterosexual sex outside of marriage are on the same exact level of sinfulness?

  • Bill

    Thank you for describing the position of the Church on these matters. It is difficult to explain to others our belief without them jumping to conclusions.

    As an theoretical question, I’m curious as to where the line between chastity and “relations” is drawn. Would it be immoral for homosexual to have a partner, even if they did not participate in “relations”? Further, where is the line drawn concerning “relations”? But these don’t seem like easily nor conclusively answerable questions.

powered by the Paulists