Busted Halo

Busted Halo contributors look at the intersection of faith and politics and examine the role of the Catholic Church in contemporary society.

Click this banner to see the entire section.

January 27th, 2012

Church and State and Charity


GOP Presidential candidate Mitt Romney released his tax returns this week, and much of the focus has been on his astronomical income and the relatively low tax rate he paid on those earnings. But also embedded in those IRS forms is evidence of Romney’s charitable giving. Over the past two years, Mitt Romney took in more than $40 million. Of that, he gave nearly $7 million to charity, almost half of which went to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commonly referred to as the Mormon Church.

Contrast Romney’s giving with a couple Roman Catholic politicos. The avuncular Vice President Joe Biden reported on his returns that he gave $369 to charity, though in fairness to him, he said he does not report contributions he made to his church. The former Speaker of the House and wanna-be president, Newt Gingrich, fares a bit better donating about two percent of his not insubstantial income to charity.

Does faith help explain the giving gap among these politicians? Perhaps.

Mormons are known for their generosity when it comes to tithing, and they are instructed to give 10 percent of their income to the church. Romney comes close, giving seven percent one year and 12 percent the next. Catholics are also exhorted to give 10 percent, but in a somewhat different way. It is generally preached that individuals split the tithe in half: five percent to church and the remaining five percent to charity.

But while Mormons are known to live up to the tithe, Catholics are not. In fact, there are entire books devoted to the study of why Catholics are so stingy when it comes to church giving. Sometimes Catholics feel they’re just not asked to contribute and sometimes they don’t feel they have enough control over their gifts. “A popular explanation for low Catholic giving emphasizes the laity’s dissatisfaction with the amount of participation they’re allowed in church-decision making in general,” explains Chuck Zech in Why Catholics Don’t Give. Contrast that with the Mormons, whose churches are lay run from bottom to top, and who have the highest giving rates among mainstream faiths.

So if you’re a student whose net worth is sadly in the red these days, are you expected to give 10 percent of the meager income you may earn from a work study job? Or, if you’re a recent grad, holding the average of $25,000 or more in student loan debt, and working for a salary that barely gets you by, should you subtract 10 percent from that for charity? Not necessarily.

Tithing is all about the spirit of generosity. One Jesuit, Fr. Bill Byron, suggests that in lieu of money, one could devote time to service. You could volunteer at your parish or at local agencies that serve the poor or marginalized. Visit an elderly person in need of company. Advocate for a cause you believe helps those with no voice. Discover your talents and use them to assist others. Members of the millenial generation, those now in their 20s and early 30s, give their time to service in unprecedented magnitude. Might that redefine what it means to tithe? But should action also be complemented with some form of financial sacrifice? Can you monetize service? Do places of worship place a premium on one over the other? How do you or your peers serve, and has that ever been done in a spirit of giving, similar to a financial gift?

While you might not have the ability yet to give massive amounts of cash, who knows, your generosity may well just be worth $7 million.

The Author : Michael O'Loughlin
Mike O'Loughlin is a writer living in Washington, D.C., covering religion, politics, and culture. In addition to Busted Halo, his writing appears in the Advocate, National Catholic Reporter, Foreign Policy, Religion & Politics, and America. He's also appeared on Fox News and MSNBC. Follow him on twitter at @mikeoloughlin.
See more articles by (49).
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.
  • jim

    There are lots more reasons i don’t give to my parish. it seems like every time i turn around, somebody is asking for a donation-2nd collections for this and that great cause, the archbishops catholic appeal, religious communities, and on and on and on…i don’t know how the mormons run-do they have a centralized finance where you give to the local church and the rest is taken care of? then there’s the whole regressive nature of a tithe-ever meet anyon who wouldn’t give 30 million if they were making 40 million? yeah, i’ve never met anyone with that problem, either. in biblical times, there were many more widow’s mites than mitts millions.

  • Zeb

    My family gives 10% of our taxable income (figured on our 1040), with half going to the two parishes we attend and half going to charities we choose. It’s a sacrifice but not a great hardship and we’re so fortunate that God put us in a wealthy and secure country that we feel it’s not our money but His anyway.

  • Bonnie Wilcox

    From my study, the Mormon tithe, which generous, is evidence of its works-righteous theology. To be loved by God, you better not break any rules.
    From my Lutheranism, I have learned that as God is abundant with me, I am abundant with others, including God’s church. It is not a perfect institution, and I am not a perfect person. But I give money, talent and time as generously as I can, and I put considerable effort to give without strings attached.

  • Julie Callahan

    I give what I can afford to charity. I don’t give anything to my church. The reason I don’t give is that my parish is full of hypocrites that put on a show of being “good Catholics” and then look down on anyone who needs charity. The leadership in our parish does nothing about the hypocrites because they are the ones with the fat checkbooks and the leadership in the parish bends over backwards to keep the rich members of the congregation happy. When my parish decides that all members of the congregation are to be treated equal maybe I will start giving again. But, ay this point, I’m not even sure I want to be Catholic anymore.

  • Aaron Cavanaugh

    Hi, I am no expert on charitable tax giving. I do know that Roosevelt tax reforms in 1935 established tax reforms for things like the estate tax. The by product was that rich people decided to donate to charities to avoid taxation. Ironically these are called “loopholes.” Now loopholes have a negative connotation. Giving money away is good, but if you are doing it to save money (and therefore make more money) the ethics of giving and peoples moral reason for giving away money becomes distorted. Ford did this by creating two foundations. One of which he was able to pass all his money on to his children without taxation. I could see this leading to a monarchy type situation. These are just my initial thoughts. Thanks. God Bless. Aaron.

powered by the Paulists