Busted Halo
googling god
The Busted Halo Question Box
Ask our spiritual experts virtually anything!
This is the place where you can ask all of those burning questions that you wouldn't dare ask in person. We will post questions here (using your byline only with permission); we guarantee an answer to everyone.

Have your own question? Then pitch it to us!

Caitlin Kennell Kim
Fr. Rick Malloy, SJ
General Questions
Fr. Tom Ryan, CSP
Ecumenical, Interfaith
Neela Kale
Culture, Moral Theology
Ann Naffziger, M.A., M.Div.
Mike Hayes
Our readers asked:

What exactly is the difference between Catholic and Lutheran belief in communion? They sound pretty alike to me.

Fr. Joe Answers:

You are correct in sensing that there is more unity than difference in the way Catholics and Lutherans understand and celebrate communion. In fact, since the Second Vatican Council there has been a “coming together” of these different Christian Churches with respect to communion. The Catholic Eucharist (Mass) is now celebrated in the language of the local community rather than in Latin. The communal celebration of the Mass is much preferred to the private celebration by a priest that was common before Vatican II. And Catholics have restored the ancient practice of communion under the forms of both bread and wine.

In dialogues between Lutheran and Catholic theologians in 1968, Lutherans agreed that the celebration of the Eucharist involves a sacrifice of praise and self-offering that unites the believer with the sacrifice of Christ. At the same time, Catholics joined Lutherans in affirming that the sacrifice of the cross was a unique, one-time event that is not “repeated” in the celebration of the Eucharist. Both Lutherans and Catholics affirmed that in the Eucharist Christ is “present wholly and entirely, in his body and blood, under the signs of bread and wine.” This “presence” of Christ in the Eucharist is more than a commemoration; it is an “effective sign” that “communicates what it promises” (“Building Unity,” Ecumenical Series IV, editors Burges and Gros: Paulist Press, 1989).

There remain some differences between Catholics and Lutherans with respect to communion. Some are matters of vocabulary. Each church forms a kind of culture with its own vocabulary and terminology. For example, Lutherans will refer to communion as “The Lord’s Supper” while Catholics prefer “Eucharist” or “Mass.” A shared vocabulary helps a group feel comfortable and at home. Sometimes differences in vocabulary make it seem that there are differences in meaning where none actually exist. It’s very important to learn and attempt to understand the vocabulary of another church in order to have a meaningful conversation.

True differences in belief and practice also remain. While both Lutherans and Catholics will bring communion from the church to members of the community who are sick, Catholics maintain the practice of reserving the communion bread in the tabernacle, which becomes a place of prayer and devotion. Lutherans do not hold the same belief that the presence of Christ continues in the bread and wine after the time and place of the celebration of the Eucharist.

Lutherans would also question the Catholic practice of offering Mass for the intentions of those who have died. While Lutherans believe in the value of offering prayers for those who have died, they would have reservations regarding Catholic belief that the Eucharist is effective as an “atoning sacrifice” for those who have died.

Catholics hold to the term “transubstantiation” to describe the reality of Christ’s presence in the Eucharist. They borrow terms from the philosophy of Aristotle to express the belief that during the Eucharist the substance of bread and wine is changed into the substance of the body and blood of Christ, while the accidents of bread and wine (what they look, feel and taste like) remain the same as they were before. Lutherans prefer to avoid the term transubstantiation and use other terms to describe their belief in the full reality of Christ’s presence.

Since I am not Lutheran, I may not have done full justice to the Lutheran position on the Eucharist, and would welcome any corrections from those who know more. However, I feel certain that there is much more agreement between Catholics and Lutherans on this matter than we often realize. I thank you for your most interesting question and hope this has helped to provide an answer.

The Author : Fr. Joe
Fr. Joe Scott, CSP, has been a campus minister, pastor and editor as a Paulist priest.
See more articles by (74).
Please note that the editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness.
  • Kai Thorsen

    The sacrifice of the Cross for Catholics is a “one time event”, but we also believe that the sacrifice of the Mass – while not a “repeat” of that sacrifice – is the SAME sacrifice: not a “symbol” or “representation” of something that happened 2000 years ago, but the SAME event, transcending time and space. When we participate in the Mass, we are no less present at the foot of the cross than were those who stood at it then. Christianity is, bottom line, a MYSTERY religion, and this belief expresses that fact beautifully.

  • Emmanuel Tovar

    Out of all the posts I’ve read regarding Roman Catholics either guessing or assuming what Lutherans believe, teach, and confess regarding the Holy Eucharist, this one was one of the few I can applaud! A bit of clarification is helpful, and if anyone ever reads this post, hopefully they can come away with a bit more information than they did before.

    “We [Lutherans] believe, teach, and confess that in the Holy Supper the body and blood of Christ are truly and essentially present, and are truly distributed and received with the bread and wine.” (Epitome of the Formula of Concord, Article VII, paragraph 6)

    Sometimes Catholics (and other Christians) erroneously think that Lutherans believe in Consubstantiation (as opposed to Transubstantiation), but that’s actually not the case, as neither Luther himself nor any of the other Lutheran Reformers ever subscribed to the concept of Consubstantiation. Luther did talk about what’s known as the Sacramental Union, but it was never used as a way to explain the how of the Real Presence. As Fr. Joe said, Lutherans and Catholic do have many things in common, including a common confession regarding our Lord’s presence in the Blessed Eucharist. Occasionally, a Lutheran will refer to our Sunday gathering as the Mass, but our most used term is Divine Service (in German: Gottesdienst). Our service is divided into two parts: Service of the word and the Service of the Sacrament. We prefer to use the phrase “Sacrament of the Altar” when referring to the Sacrament, but the terms “Holy Communion”, “Eucharist”, and “Lord’s Supper” are also common terms used among Lutherans.

    Lutherans would reject the practice of “offering” Masses for those who have died as well as the concept of the Sacrifice of the Mass as being an atoning sacrifice (but that’s another topic for another discussion). Before I go on a huge lesson, I think what I’ve said here will suffice for now. If you come across this post, and would like to discuss this more or maybe you have misconceptions about what Lutherans actually believe, feel free to email me at etovar1991@me.com. Lutherans and Catholics, despite what we do disagree on, do have many similar beliefs.

powered by the Paulists